Can you Trust the Science of the Great Reset? or "The Economic Motivation Behind the Corruption of Science in America"

You may wonder why the wicked Wikipedia called the theories of Charles H. Hapgood in the "Earth's Shifting Crust" "pseudo-science" when their favorite uncle Albert Einstein wrote the forward to this book and was not so excited about an idea since he discovered relativity while reading Poincare's "Science and Hypothesis."

The Earth's Shifing Crust

My opinion of Einstein since learning of his collaboration with Hapgood in the development of Hapgood's theory in the "Earth's Shifting Crust" has increased enormously in the positive direction.

"In the 20th century the physicists became incomprehensible, and the philosophers started describing science in terms of revolutions and paradigms."

It was really mathematics that ruined physics not Einstein and Schlafly proves in his book that Einstein was not a very good mathematician.

"Einstein went on to publish seven different proofs of E = MC^2 over the course of forty years, but all of them were incorrect."

How Einstein ruined physics by Roger Schlafly PHD (in mathematics)

Mathematics took physics further and further away from empiricism and toward the imagination of the mathematicians. I have a book on mathematical biophysics and all of its equations have lead nowhere since its publication in 1948.

A revolution has occurred in biology during the 21st century not because of any pure mathematical reasoning but by the genetic engineering of living organisms in experiment, after experiment, after experiment used to test hypothesis, after hypothesis, after hypothesis along the way.

Here Richard Gage gives an excellent explanation on how real science (not the patholigical science of corrupt authoritative governments) is supposed to work.

Einstein did help Hapgood but Einstein was not the only scientist that Hapgood collaborated with in the development of his theory; he used many others. In fact, Hapgood's theory was not Hapgood's personal theory at all but a collaborative effort of many scientists across a broad spectrum of disciplines, for Hapgood realized that any important advancement in science is the result of a collaborative effort between many different scientists - an idea that Einstein worshipers have yet to figure out.

The wicked Wikipedia opposed Hapgood's idea that the entire crust of the earth could move, I believe, because the logical outcome of this idea (and the data supporting it) is that the ice ages and warm periods on the earth were not due to any warming or cooling on a global scale but due to the movement of the crust of the earth that changed the relative positions of the north and south poles.

This throws out the window the theory that supposed global changes in the earths climate are do to changes in the amount of CO2 in its atmosphere - a theory which the wicked wikipedia supports - and which truely is a pseudo-science.

Can you Trust the Science of the Great Reset? or "The Economic Motivation Behind the Corruption of Science in America"

A global ice age would have caused the extinction of the tropical corals which are extremely sensitive to temperature changes. As the tropical corals have never become extinct this means that their distribution on the earth's crust must have changed as the position of the crust under which they grew changed from a tropical to a more temperorate climatic zone.

The idea is essentially sound and explains much of the fossil record but just how it occurs may be difficult to solve because we have what is called in physics a "3 body problem." The earth revolves around the sun with its location rotating about a point near its surface which is the center of gravity of the moon and the earth as they jointly revolve around the sun together. The forces acting on the crust may be periodic but unpredictable which is what we see in the fossil record with regard to the ice ages. Only Hapgoods theory can make any sense of what is going on if the situation can be resolved at all.